Economics, Ethics and Environmental Problems

Peter Söderbaum
Additional contact information
Peter Söderbaum: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics and Statistics, Box 7013, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden

Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 1986, vol. 1, issue 3, 139-153

Abstract: The relevance and usefulness of mainstream or neoclassical economics has been questioned more in some fields of inquiry than in others. Against the background of an attempt to characterize environmental problems, the fruitfulness of conventional ideas of economic analysis, as carried out in practice in the form of cost-benefit analysis, is questioned. Alternative approaches judged to be more compatible with environmental problems are indicated.It is argued that cost-benefit analysis represents a closed ethic or ideology and that approaches which open the way for various possible ethical or ideological standpoints are more promising. Different principles of resource allocation or housekeeping should be considered and the idea of only one “scientifically correct†or “true†principle abandoned. Non-monetary principles of housekeeping, such as specific versions of ecological ethics, are not “less economic†than the now dominant monetary principles.

Date: 1986
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jie.sagepub.com/content/1/3/139.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jinter:v:1:y:1986:i:3:p:139-153

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().