EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Measuring Gender Discrimination: The Indian Experience and a new Index

Anish Kumar Mukhopadhyay, Pinaki Chakrabarti and Sugata Marjit
Additional contact information
Anish Kumar Mukhopadhyay: Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, R-1 Baishnabghata Patuli Township, Kolkata – 700094, Kolkata, India. babai25@rediffmail.com
Pinaki Chakrabarti: Professor of Economics, University of Burdwan, India. cpinaki@gmail.com

Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 2009, vol. 21, issue 1, 53-68

Abstract: The problem of gender disparity exists in India as in many other developing and developed countries. There is a growing concern about the falling female-male ratio (FMR), a very important indicator of this inequality. Overall evaluation of the quality of life in the mode of averages puts little weight on the reality of a falling sex ratio. The standard gender development measures capture this inequality inadequately. The literature records a number of contradictory claims and findings on the subject. Strikingly, this falling FMR over time reflects gross deprivation of nearly fifty percent of our population and given that these deprivations are rising, the increasing value of gender development index is highly misleading, possibly concealing a deteriorating quality of life for females. The basic objective of this paper is to construct an aggregative index which will be able to resolve the problem.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jie.sagepub.com/content/21/1/53.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jinter:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:53-68

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-02
Handle: RePEc:sae:jinter:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:53-68