 Public Wealth and Private Riches: Past and PresentGeorge E. Foy
Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 1989, vol. 3, issue 1, 3-10 Abstract: The classical economists defined national wealth as the sum of goods with exchange value. Lauderdale, a contemporary of Adam Smith, drew a distinction between private riches, the classical definition, and public wealth, the sum of all goods with use value. Public wealth included abundant environmental goods such as clean air and water. Lauderdale maintained that private riches could expand due to the scarcity of formerly free, but unmeasured public wealth. Hence the classical measure of wealth would give a misleading indication of the total goods available to society under conditions of environmental scarcity. The classical economists denied the relevance of Lauderdale’s thesis for their time.The modern national economic accounts follow the classical concept in omitting the services of free environmental resources. However, environmental conditions have now changed to the point where Lauderdale’s concept of public wealth is more relevant than the classical concept of private riches. Hence current measures of national economic performance should be revised so they will indicate whether we have more or less total goods and services available to us over time in a world of environmental scarcity. Date: 1989 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jinter:v:3:y:1989:i:1:p:3-10 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.