The Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis to Decide Environmental Policy – a Dead End?

Hege Westskog
Additional contact information
Hege Westskog: Centre for Development and the Environment (SUM), University of Oslo, Hege Westskog, SUM, P.b.1116 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway. Tel: +4722858914, Fax: +4722858920, e-mail: hege.westskog@sum.uio.no

Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 1997, vol. 8, issue 3, 185-208

Abstract: In this paper I discuss two questions which the decision maker has to consider before she makes use of the method of cost benefit analysis. First, she has to ask herself if she shares the ethical foundation of environmental cost benefit analysis. If not, could environmental cost benefit analysis be adjusted such that her ethical beliefs are incorporated? Second, if the decision maker shares the ethical foundation of environmental cost-benefit analysis, is this method appropriate when there are individuals in a society that hold other ethical beliefs than those implicitly assumed in an environmental cost-benefit analysis? When discussing these questions I focus on two different perspectives – the deontological and the agency aspect of individual preferences. I argue that the answer to both questions is «no», though the answer to the second question is not as clear as the answer to the first.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jie.sagepub.com/content/8/3/185.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jinter:v:8:y:1997:i:3:p:185-208

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().