The Methodology Rather than the Rhetoric of Economics: McCloskey on Popper and Hume

Hugh V. McLachlan and John Swales ()
Additional contact information
Hugh V. McLachlan: Department of Social Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK

Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 1998, vol. 9, issue 2, 125-143

Abstract: McCloskey is against what he considers to be the traditional approach to the philosophy and methodology of economics. He is specifically opposed to the philosophies (of knowledge) of Hume and, even more so, of Popper. He seems, generally, to be against philosophy or, at least, philosophy of knowledge and methodology as such and, in comparison to them, offers ‘rhetoric’ for more favourable consideration. We argue that the epistemologies of Hume and of Popper should, indeed, be rejected but that they should be rejected on philosophical and methodological grounds rather than on ‘rhetorical’ ones. While some particular methodological theories can and should, as McCloskey suggests, be abandoned, economic methodology as such stands undamaged by McCloskey’s attempted attack upon it.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jie.sagepub.com/content/9/2/125.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jinter:v:9:y:1998:i:2:p:125-143

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().