Post–Cold War Anthropology as Ideological Blog

Brooks Duncan
Additional contact information
Brooks Duncan: Independent Scholar and Consultant

Journal of Developing Societies, 2013, vol. 29, issue 1, 61-87

Abstract: This essay examines the anthropology of Russia and Eastern Europe two decades after the end of the Cold War. It discusses how the ideology and political pressures of that era continue to influence and distort the discipline, hindering social science advances in the comparative study of empires and the development of cultures and social systems. The essay reviews a representative book in the field and uses it as a take-off point for examining the politicization and stagnation (or disintegration) of a discipline, which should be both a comparative and predictive science as well as a “humanities†subject that answers basic questions about how to improve human societies and define “development†and “progress.†This review also offers a set of guidelines on how anthropology can be improved to refocus on meeting human intellectual and social aspirations.

Keywords: Russia; Eastern Europe; Soviet Union; anthropology; ethnography; culture; development; post-socialist; food studies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0169796X12470555 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jodeso:v:29:y:2013:i:1:p:61-87

DOI: 10.1177/0169796X12470555

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Developing Societies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().