Military scientism and its discontents

Rodrick Wallace

The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 2022, vol. 19, issue 4, 613-623

Abstract: The asymptotic limit theorems of control and information theories allow the examination of systemic failures afflicting “scientific†approaches to armed conflict such as reflexive control, the OODA loop, and East Asian alternatives. Large-scale combat, like other major human enterprise, is a form of dialog between cognitive institutional entities only loosely following shifting “laws†that most often express a path-dependent historical trajectory constrained by powerful cultural riverbanks. Such “conversations,†while having their own grammar and syntax, can involve matters of science, engineering, and technology, but they are not, of themselves, scientific in the Western sense. They may, however, be studied using the methodologies of historiography, social science, human ecology, and the like. Moving much beyond this is to invoke an alternate reality.

Keywords: military theory; phase transition; probability models; statistical tools; Yerkes–Dodson law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129211014281 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:joudef:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:613-623

DOI: 10.1177/15485129211014281

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().