Unemployment Trends in Some American Cities with Living Wage Ordinances

James A. Buss and Dina Franceschi
Additional contact information
James A. Buss: Department of Economics, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT 06824, USA. E-mail: jabuss@mail.fairfield.edu
Dina Franceschi: Department of Economics, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT 06824, USA. E-mail: jabuss@mail.fairfield.edu

Local Economy, 2003, vol. 18, issue 3, 208-221

Abstract: Abstract By early 2003, more than 90 American cities and counties have passed laws, called Living Wage Ordinances, which require companies that have contracts with these municipalities and/or receive tax subsidies to pay their workers a wage above the federal minimum rate. The levels of these wages and the types of workers who are affected by these living wage ordinances are reviewed. Also examined are the major arguments for and against these laws. This study looks at the trends in unemployment rates in 40 cities that have enacted Living Wage Ordinances. Each city's unemployment rate is compared to that in its metropolitan area, its state, and the nation. The study reveals that experiences are mixed. Some cities with living wage ordinances have experienced an improvement in their relative employment situation. Other cities have experienced just the opposite.

Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0269094032000111020 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:loceco:v:18:y:2003:i:3:p:208-221

DOI: 10.1080/0269094032000111020

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Local Economy from London South Bank University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().