Livelihood Challenges, Community Perception and Payment for Ecosystem Services: The Curious Case of Fisherfolk of the River Ganga

Soumi Roy Chowdhury, Nutan Maurya and Sanjib Pohit
Additional contact information
Soumi Roy Chowdhury: Soumi Roy Chowdhury is an Assistant Professor at the IRMA School, “Tribhuvan†Sahkari University, Anand, Gujarat, India. Dr Roy Chowdhury was working at NCAER when the study was conducted. E-mail: soumi@irma.ac.in
Nutan Maurya: Nutan Maurya is an independent researcher. Dr Maurya was a Research Collaborator in the Water to Cloud (W2C) project of the UChicago Center in New Delhi during the study period. E-mail: nutanmaurya@gmail.com
Sanjib Pohit: Sanjib Pohit (corresponding author) is a Professor at the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), New Delhi, India. E-mail: spohit@ncaer.org

Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2025, vol. 19, issue 1, 50-69

Abstract: The river Ganga’s ecological significance in the spiritual landscape of India gives it a unique economic and socio-cultural eminence. Using the framework of ecosystem services evaluation and people’s perception, this study explores the willingness of riverine fishing communities to pay towards initiatives aimed at restoring the quality of Ganga River water. The article is based on a published NCAER report entitled, ‘Livelihood and health challenges of riverine communities of the River Ganga’ (Pohit et al., 2020). A primary survey of 800 fishermen was undertaken along the upstream and downstream of the river Ganga in two states of India, Uttar Pradesh (UP) and West Bengal (WB), during January–February 2020. First, a theme-based content analysis was conducted to map the community’s perception. It reflected the implications of river water pollution on the livelihood of fishermen and the cultural values associated with the Ganga separately for the two states. Second, a contingent valuation exercise was undertaken, which found that 34 and 25 per cent of the fishermen, respectively, in UP and WB, were ready to pay towards the cleaning of the Ganga. Income constraint was the main reason limiting the willingness to pay, followed by perceptions that river restoration was the government’s responsibility. Only 11 per cent of the respondents in both states agreed to accept any compensation for their livelihood implications in lieu of more pollution. Interestingly, our regression analysis shows that fishermen who were willing to accept compensation were at lower odds of paying towards cleanliness. JEL Codes: Q51, Q53, Q57, I31, R58

Keywords: River Ganga; Contingent Valuation; Pollution; Fisherfolk; India; Ecosystem Services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00252921251365305 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:mareco:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:50-69

DOI: 10.1177/00252921251365305

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research from National Council of Applied Economic Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().