Indian System of Fringe Benefits Tax

Praveen Kishore
Additional contact information
Praveen Kishore: Praveen Kishore, a member of the Indian Revenue Service (IRS), is presently Joint Director, Directorate of Human Resource Development, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi; e-mail: praveenkishore@rediffmail.com

Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2008, vol. 2, issue 4, 369-413

Abstract: A recent controversial move by the Indian income tax authorities was the introduction of a fringe benefits tax (FBT) in 2005. Its introduction has been justified on the grounds that it taxes fringe benefits which are collectively enjoyed by employees and are in the form of facilities and amenities that are difficult to identify, segregate and apportion and tax among beneficiaries. Accordingly, the tax liability has been fixed on employers and not on employees. FBT collection data for the first two years have been analysed to gain deeper insight into reforming and fine-tuning the FBT regime. It has been found that banking and insurance, infotech and petrochemicals are some important sectors of the economy that contribute significantly to FBT collection. Further, out of the expense heads specified as the base of FBT, it was found that ‘employee welfare’, ‘conveyance’, ‘telephones’ and ‘maintenance of cars’ are most important in terms of collection. Evidence from statistical tests shows that the proportion of FBT collection from different heads has remained constant over the two years of its operation, even at the level of economy sectors. Other tests show that there are significant interaction effects between FBT heads and economy sectors. However, statistical evidence shows that sample data are not homogeneous, which points towards arbitrary booking of expenses under different heads, possibly to avoid the FBT.

Keywords: Taxation; Business Taxes; Tax Evasion; Other Sources of Revenue; Fiscal Policy and Behaviour of Economic Agents; JEL Classification: H2; JEL Classification: H20; JEL Classification: H25; JEL Classification: H26; JEL Classification: H27; JEL Classification: H3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097380100800200403 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:mareco:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:369-413

DOI: 10.1177/097380100800200403

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research from National Council of Applied Economic Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().