EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Detecting Data Error and Inaccuracy

Faraji Kasidi, H. Chaturvedi and Rahul Singh
Additional contact information
Faraji Kasidi: Faraji Kasidi, Lecturer, Institute of Accountancy Arusha, Tanzania and Research Scholar, Birla Institute of Management Technology, Greater Noida, India. e-mail: fkasidi@gmail.com(corresponding author)
H. Chaturvedi: H. Chaturvedi, Professor and Director, Birla Institute of Management Technology, Greater Noida, India. e-mail: director@bimtech.ac.in

Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2010, vol. 4, issue 4, 405-425

Abstract: Several studies reveal that organisational databases have significant errors (Klein, 2000; Morgenstern, 1963; Musgrove, 1974). Attributed to this, researchers, policy makers and other users are obliged to authenticate collected data for its randomness before usage in order to prevent problems caused by erroneous data. The objective of this study is to establish random databases for furthering scientific analysis. Motivation for the study comes from the circumstances where scientific inquiry is juxtaposed with different databases or sources of the same unit of inquiry having different datasets. This study uses three databases used by the Indian government, namely, the Economic Survey, Reserve Bank of India and United Nations Conference for Trade and Development (UNCTAD) on FDI inflows to the Indian economy (1991–2007), to establish randomness and detect data errors and inaccuracies. Applying the Run test method, the study established that all three datasets are random. The Chi-square test supports the dataset used by the Economic Survey and not other databases. Also, the Economic Survey dataset follows Benford’s distribution and its Pearson correlation coefficient is higher than the other sources of data. In general, the Economic Survey database does better in terms of data accuracy compared to other datasets for the period of study.

Keywords: Data Error; Data Inaccuracy; Foreign Direct Investment; FDI; JEL Classification: C10; JEL Classification: C82; JEL Classification: F21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097380101000400402 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:mareco:v:4:y:2010:i:4:p:405-425

DOI: 10.1177/097380101000400402

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research from National Council of Applied Economic Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:sae:mareco:v:4:y:2010:i:4:p:405-425