Post-Doha Trade Policy Options for a Small Country

Alan Deardorff

Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2011, vol. 5, issue 1, 117-138

Abstract: This paper uses a partial equilibrium model of two small countries, within a large world economy, implementing reciprocal tariff cuts on each other’s exports in a regional trade agreement (RTA) and compares the effects with unilateral most favoured nation (MFN) tariff cuts. The reciprocal cuts are shown to be more likely beneficial to a country if the partner country’s trade is larger. The welfare effects of a country’s own tariff cut on imports are also compared to the effects on its welfare of the partner country’s tariff cut on its exports. If tariff levels are low, the latter is seen to be larger than the former. Implications of the analysis are that, if multilateral trade liberalisation is unlikely, then small countries should seek to form RTAs with countries larger than themselves. In addition, to assure that they have something to offer in such arrangements, they should not go too far in unilaterally reducing their MFN tariffs.

Keywords: Regional Trade Agreements; Free Trade Agreements; JEL Classification: F13 Commercial Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097380101000500107 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Post-Doha Trade Policy Options for a Small Country (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:mareco:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:117-138

DOI: 10.1177/097380101000500107

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research from National Council of Applied Economic Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().