EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Re-examination of the Infant Industry Argument for Protection

Arvind Panagariya

Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2011, vol. 5, issue 1, 7-30

Abstract: Though a logically tight case for infant industry protection has never been made, proprotection authors have claimed its truth since at least its statement by Alexander Hamilton in 1791. In the 1970s and the 1980s, the argument had receded into the background following its influential critiques by trade economists James Meade, Harry Johnson and Robert Baldwin. But globalisation critics have recently revived it giving it new guises. This requires a fresh response from pro-free trade economists so that the fog is removed yet again and clear thinking restored. Accordingly, in this paper, I revisit the argument and its logical flaws. I demonstrate that the new packaging provided by proprotection authors cannot hide the fundamental logical flaws in the argument. Nor is there compelling evidence of successful infant industry promotion once the costs and benefits are both taken into account instead of just the benefits. The argument is often pegged on externalities. But once the precise source of the externality is pinned down, protection as an instrument to correct it turns out to be ineffective.

Keywords: Infant Industry; Learning by Doing; Import Substitution; External Economies; Protection; JEL Classification: F13; JEL Classification: O14; JEL Classification: O24; JEL Classification: O25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097380101000500102 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:mareco:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:7-30

DOI: 10.1177/097380101000500102

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research from National Council of Applied Economic Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:sae:mareco:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:7-30