THE EFFECT OF WORK STATUS AND WORKING CONDITIONS ON MENTAL HEALTH IN FOUR OECD COUNTRIES
Ana Llena-Nozal
Additional contact information
Ana Llena-Nozal: OECD, Ana.Llena-Nozal@oecd.org
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Ana Llena-Nozal
National Institute Economic Review, 2009, vol. 209, issue 1, 72-87
Abstract:
This study aims to assess empirically whether being employed or returning to work is beneficial for all in terms of mental health, especially for those who already suffer from a longstanding illness or disability. We use longitudinal surveys from Australia, Canada, Switzerland and the UK to estimate panel data models that link decisions regarding labour market choices to health developments. To allow for state dependence of mental health, a dynamic panel model is used. The longitudinal analysis shows that non-employment generally is worse for mental health than working. The mental-health payoff to employment varies depending on the type of employment contract and working conditions. In particular, the mental health benefits for inactive individuals who obtain a non-standard job appear to be smaller than for those moving into standard employment arrangements, even after controlling for pre-existing mental health problems.
Keywords: Health; working conditions; models with panel data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (39)
Downloads: (external link)
http://ner.sagepub.com/content/209/1/72.abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:niesru:v:209:y:2009:i:1:p:72-87
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in National Institute Economic Review from National Institute of Economic and Social Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().