FISCAL DISCIPLINE: RULES RATHER THAN INSTITUTIONS

Charles Wyplosz

National Institute Economic Review, 2011, vol. 217, issue 1, R19-R30

Abstract: The lack of fiscal discipline is a natural and pervasive implication of the perceived separation between the benefits from public spending and the taxes that individuals and interest groups receive and pay, respectively. The implication is that budget preparation, decision and execution must be constrained. The challenge is that the policymakers who need to be constrained are those who must decide the constraints. Two broad classes of solutions are possible: institutions that shape the budgetary process and quantitative rules that set limits. The mounting experience with both institutions and rules is disappointing, for reasons that are often complementary. Examining the reasons for this state of affairs, this article argues that institutions and rules ought to be combined and associated with advisory fiscal councils.

Keywords: Fiscal discipline; deficit bias; policy rules; fiscal institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ner.sagepub.com/content/217/1/R19.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Fiscal Discipline: Rules Rather than Institutions (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:niesru:v:217:y:2011:i:1:p:r19-r30

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in National Institute Economic Review from National Institute of Economic and Social Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().