Precarious and Productive Work in the Digital Economy
Diane Coyle ()
National Institute Economic Review, 2017, vol. 240, issue 1, R5-R14
Digital platforms have the potential to create benefits for their suppliers or workers as well as their customers, yet there is a heated debate about the character of this work and whether the platforms should be more heavily regulated. Beyond the high-profile global platforms, the technology is contributing to changing patterns of work. Yet the existing framework of employment legislation and public policy more broadly â€“ from minimum wages to benefits and pensions â€“ is structured around the concept of â€˜the firmâ€™ as the agent of policy delivery. To reshape policies in order to protect the interests of people as workers as well as consumers, it is important to understand why digital innovators make the choices they do, and therefore how labour market policies can improve working conditions without constraining the productivity and consumer benefits enabled by digital business models.
Keywords: platforms; contingent work; gig economy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D20 O35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:niesru:v:240:y:2017:i:1:p:r5-r14
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in National Institute Economic Review from National Institute of Economic and Social Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().