Does TRIPS Drive to Productivity Growth in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry
Jaswinder Singh and
Parminder Singh
Paradigm, 2017, vol. 21, issue 2, 211-228
Abstract:
This article endeavours to analyse the inter-firm variations in total factor productivity growth (TFPG) of Indian pharmaceutical industry during the pre-Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and post-TRIPS period by using non-parametric Malmquist productivity index (MPI). For analysis purpose, data for 30 major Indian pharmaceutical firms have been culled out from the various reports of the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) during the period of 1991–2011. The empirical results reveal that the TFPG of the 30 major Indian pharmaceutical firms recorded to be 0.02 per cent and both the technological progress and efficiency change are equally contributing to the TFPG of the firms during entire study and pre-TRIPS period. It has been observed that TFPG has marginally regressed by 0.04 per cent in the post-TRIPS period and the negative growth of the average TFPG was contributed by technical inefficiency, whereas the positive technological progress helps to cover the impact of inefficiencies on TFPG. However, the growth of efficiency remains negative throughout the study period, which has been contributed both by the scale inefficiency and by the pure inefficiency, whereas the technological progress has a favourable impact on the productivity growth of the industry during the post-TRIPS period. Therefore, it can be inferred that the managerial, technical and scale inefficiencies in Indian pharmaceutical industry should be checked in order to operate at optimal scale and achieve potential productivity growth in the post-TRIPS period.
Keywords: Malmquist productivity index; TFP; pharmaceutical industry; TRIPS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971890717750063 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:padigm:v:21:y:2017:i:2:p:211-228
DOI: 10.1177/0971890717750063
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Paradigm
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().