Sustainability Reporting Under GRI Standards: An Empirical Study of Indian Companies
Prasid Gurung and
Soumitra Sarkar
Paradigm, 2024, vol. 28, issue 2, 185-203
Abstract:
The accumulation of industrial waste at the global level is distressing, as the World Bank estimated in 2016 that the growth of solid waste will hit 3.4 billion tonnes by 2050. India faces similar issues related to inefficient waste management and enfeebled waste reporting practices as the Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) estimated that more than 62 million tons of industrial waste are generated annually, of which around 12 million tons are treated before disposal, 31 million tons are diverted towards landfills, and the majority is unprocessed and unaccounted for. In this response, this study analyses the waste reporting practices adopted by the top corporate social responsibilities ranked Indian companies with a motivation to align the Indian reporting pattern with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The study finds inconsistent, unstandardized, and unstructured waste reporting practices when analysed under the GRI across the selected Indian companies concerning massive waste generation per turnover and earnings per share. The findings suggest the need for integrated compliance towards reporting standards to control any negative impact on the environment, as shown through waste intensity ratios. The findings have largely contributed towards understanding the anomalies between the Indian corporate reporting practices and the global reporting under GRI.
Keywords: Global reporting initiatives; sustainability; industrial waste; waste intensities ratios; waste management; corporate reporting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09718907241268977 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:padigm:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:185-203
DOI: 10.1177/09718907241268977
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Paradigm
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().