Debating the merits of biotech crop adoption in sub-Saharan Africa

Brian M. Dowd-Uribe and Jim Bingen
Additional contact information
Brian M. Dowd-Uribe: Department of Environmental Studies University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
Jim Bingen: Community, Agriculture, Recreation and Resource Studies Michigan State University, USA

Progress in Development Studies, 2011, vol. 11, issue 1, 63-68

Abstract: The debate on whether genetically engineered (GE) crops can alleviate poverty in Africa continues to intensify. Thus far only one GE crop has been commercialized among smallholders – a pest resistant form of cotton – and only in two sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. We present evidence from Burkina Faso to argue that GE cotton adoption may increase the risk of all producers, may only bring benefits in the short term and may only benefit the relatively rich more than the relatively poor. These findings challenge the popular assumption that GE crops are the best way to alleviate rural poverty in SSA.

Keywords: GEOs; Africa; Burkina Faso; cotton; poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/146499341001100104 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:prodev:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:63-68

DOI: 10.1177/146499341001100104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Progress in Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().