EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mapping the complexities and highlighting the dangers: The global drive to end FGM in the UK and Sudan

Nafisa Bedri and Tamsin Bradley
Additional contact information
Nafisa Bedri: International & External Relations Office, Ahfad University for Women, Omdurman, Sudan
Tamsin Bradley: University of Portsmouth, Park Building, King Henry Street, Portsmouth, United Kingdom

Progress in Development Studies, 2017, vol. 17, issue 1, 24-37

Abstract: This article maps out the UK Department for International Development’s (DfID) global push to end the practice of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C). In particular, it looks at how the various components aim to link together filling evidence gaps and seeking to identify what works to finally end this brutal practice. Throughout the article, we voice a caution that if the numerous programmes emerging are not shaped by grass-roots experiences of FGM, and specifically by local change agents, there is a real danger that this opportunity will fail. In highlighting this danger, we present the viewpoint of community groups and local activists in the United Kingdom and also Sudan. We place these voices within the complex web of interventions that comprise the Free Sudan from the FGM/C programme. If not sufficiently coordinated and responsive to communities, it simply will not work. To emphasize this caution, we draw on a variety of theories that help us understand how discourses around FGM have emerged and intertwine. We also draw on theory to highlight an over reliance on a constructed image of a suffering FGM victim which makes it difficult for local activists to be heard.

Keywords: Female genital mutilation; gender; human rights; Sudan; violence; culture; medicalisation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464993416674299 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:prodev:v:17:y:2017:i:1:p:24-37

DOI: 10.1177/1464993416674299

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Progress in Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:17:y:2017:i:1:p:24-37