Sustainable resilience? Disaster recovery and the marginalization of sociocultural needs and concerns
Gemma Sou
Additional contact information
Gemma Sou: Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Progress in Development Studies, 2019, vol. 19, issue 2, 144-159
Abstract:
Resilience has become the dominant and normative ideology of sustainability more generally, and disaster recovery more specifically. Most studies focus on how to achieve resilient recovery. This is premised on an assumption that resilience meets the needs and concerns of disaster-affected populations and is thereby sustainable. However, this article critically explores to what extent the recovery needs and concerns of disaster-affected households fit neatly within resilience vernacular and analytical frameworks. The research shows that resilience is informed by a reductive understanding of human needs as many socio-cultural needs of disaster-affected people are marginalized from resilience-based recovery. The article suggests that if disaster recovery is to be a normative and sustainable agenda, then resilience alone may be insufficient, and that needs and concerns that do not directly adapt to, reduce or avoid the impacts of hazards, ought to be prioritized in recovery programmes. The article explores these issues by investigating self-build housing processes in a post-disaster setting in Cochabamba city in Bolivia.
Keywords: Resilience; disaster recovery; sustainability; Bolivia; self-build housing; anthropocentric house; disaster risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464993418824192 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:prodev:v:19:y:2019:i:2:p:144-159
DOI: 10.1177/1464993418824192
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Progress in Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().