Taking choice seriously: Emic understandings of decision-making about child marriage

Esther Miedema, Winny Koster and Nicky Pouw
Additional contact information
Esther Miedema: Governance and Inclusive Development Programme Group (GID), Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Winny Koster: Governance and Inclusive Development Programme Group (GID), Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15629, 1001 NC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Nicky Pouw: Governance and Inclusive Development Programme Group (GID), Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15629, 1001 NC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Progress in Development Studies, 2020, vol. 20, issue 4, 261-269

Abstract: In recent years, the international community has increasingly directed its attention to reducing the prevalence of child marriage, which is defined as marriage before the age of 18. Child marriage has been shown to disproportionately affect young women in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, and to have a range of adverse health impacts, particularly for women. This special issue demonstrates empirically the complexity of drivers of child marriage, contributing to emic understandings of the circumstances in which families and young women consider an early marriage the most secure pathway. The special issue calls for moving beyond girls and families as sites of intervention, and beyond programmatic emphases on individual choice and ‘tradition.’ In this introductory article, we draw attention to the consequences of the exclusive focus on negative consequences of child marriage, arguing that this (a) obscures the complexity of the structural issues driving child marriage, (b) hinders developing understanding of (perceived) positive outcomes of a marriage before the age of 18, such as (short-term) physical and economic security, and (c) forms an impediment to efforts to identify alternatives to child marriage which can produce similarly positive—and more long-term—results. Rather than departing from the premise that certain choices are better than others, we call for research and interventions that seek to understand and respond to the broader context in which choices are made.

Keywords: Child marriage; gender; emic understandings; choice; securities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464993420965315 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:prodev:v:20:y:2020:i:4:p:261-269

DOI: 10.1177/1464993420965315

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Progress in Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().