Discourses of postmodern epistemology: radical impetus lost?
Martin Müller
Additional contact information
Martin Müller: Department of Geography, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany and Development Studies Committee, University of Cambridge, UK
Progress in Development Studies, 2006, vol. 6, issue 4, 306-320
Abstract:
Exhibiting a highly divisive agenda postmodernism has created profound chasms across scientific communities. In development studies its radical impetus has translated into the postdevelopment perspective which violently repudiates the modernist development project. This paper crystallises two distinct discourses of working upon the epistemological raw material of postmodernism: an exclusivist discourse, which reinforces the chasm by isolating postmodernism, and an inclusivist discourse, which fosters mutual engagement between modernism and postmodernism. I contrast the trajectory of this inclusivist discourse in development studies to the hegemony of an exclusivist discourse in geography and find the preponderance of an inclusivist discourse to yield a higher radical potential and produce a kind of hybrid development research that is neither modern nor postmodern. Concluding I suggest that the relationship between modernism and postmodernism be thought of not in an exclusivist way as two competing paradigms, as it is often done, but rather as of two poles of negotiation between which a future sustained engagement should occur to enrich the theoretical and practical body of the discipline.
Keywords: discourse; geography; hybridity; postdevelopment; postmodernism; radicalism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/1464993406ps145oa (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:prodev:v:6:y:2006:i:4:p:306-320
DOI: 10.1191/1464993406ps145oa
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Progress in Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().