Psychology and National Development

Fathali M. Moghaddam, Cynthia Bianchi, Katherine Daniels, Michael J. Apter and Rom Harré
Additional contact information
Fathali M. Moghaddam: Georgetown University, Washington D.C., U.S.A
Cynthia Bianchi: Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
Katherine Daniels: Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
Michael J. Apter: Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
Rom Harré: Georgetown University, Washington D.C., U.S.A.

Psychology and Developing Societies, 1999, vol. 11, issue 2, 119-141

Abstract: Psychologists have important contributions to make to the debate on national development, particularly because human development is now viewed as central to national development. A major shortcoming of the psychological literature on national development is the lack of an adequate explanation of change. We address this gap through an account of national development based on social reducton theory and reversal theory, two recent theories that focus on change and stability.

Date: 1999
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133369901100201 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:psydev:v:11:y:1999:i:2:p:119-141

DOI: 10.1177/097133369901100201

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Psychology and Developing Societies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().