Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences

Jai B.P. Sinha, C.N. Daftuar, Rajen K. Gupta, Ramesh C. Mishra, R. Jayseetha, S.S. Jha, Jyoti Verma and V.S.R. Vijayakumar
Additional contact information
Jai B.P. Sinha: A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna
C.N. Daftuar: M.S. University, Baroda
Rajen K. Gupta: Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow
Ramesh C. Mishra: Banaras Hindu University.
R. Jayseetha: University of Bangalore, Bangalore
S.S. Jha: Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Jyoti Verma: Institute of Psychological Research and Service, Patna University, Patna, India
V.S.R. Vijayakumar: Department of Psychology, University of Madras, Madras, India

Psychology and Developing Societies, 1994, vol. 6, issue 2, 131-149

Abstract: Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure. The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.

Date: 1994
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133369400600204 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:psydev:v:6:y:1994:i:2:p:131-149

DOI: 10.1177/097133369400600204

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Psychology and Developing Societies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().