The Benefit Incidence of Consumption Public Goods

Daniel P. Hewitt
Additional contact information
Daniel P. Hewitt: University of Connecticut, Georgetown University

Public Finance Review, 1987, vol. 15, issue 2, 138-165

Abstract: This article offers a total benefits approach to measuring the incidence of government expenditures as an alternative to equating benefits to Lindahl taxes. The procedure begins by decomposing each government program into its categories of benefits (or characteristies), which include (1) transfer, (2) productivity enhancements, and (3) public consumption benefits. The next step is to assess the benefit incidence of each category individually. The main result of this article, whieh focuses on the last category, is that the incidence ofpure consumption public goods is inversely related to their income elasticity of demand. The result follows from the definition of benefits and because these goods definitionally enter the utility function in a separable manner. Empirical estimates of the income elasticity of several programs confirms the plausibility of the separability property and the existence of different incidence types among the public goods, and thereby disproves the contention that the Lindahl taxes are the universal benefit taxes.

Date: 1987
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114218701500202 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:15:y:1987:i:2:p:138-165

DOI: 10.1177/109114218701500202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Finance Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().