The Incidence of State Taxes on Oil and Gas

Jonathan Haughton and David Tuerck
Additional contact information
David Tuerck: Suffolk University and Beacon Hill Institute for Public Policy

Public Finance Review, 2006, vol. 34, issue 5, 527-550

Abstract: The rising economic value of Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) waters, for oil and gas as well as wind farms, has attracted the attention of abutting states. Thus Louisiana, faced with dwindling revenues from the oil and gas severance tax and high costs of reconstruction after Hurricane Katrina, is again considering the merits of an oil and gas processing tax that would tax OCS production. Such a tax was proposed in 1998, to be levied at a rate of $1.15 per barrel on oil and $0.06 per thousand cubic feet on natural gas. Using a multiequation partial equilibrium model, the authors show that revenue would rise by $1.5 billion in the short run but just $0.2 billion in the long run. The important general finding is that even with a clever tax, it is difficult for a state to appropriate resource rents arising outside its boundaries. Proponents and opponents of the processing tax continue to make exaggerated claims; hence the authors’ second finding is that tax modeling remains essential to help generate light rather than heat.

Keywords: processing tax; oil and gas; OCS waters; Louisiana; resource rent (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1091142106288995 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:34:y:2006:i:5:p:527-550

DOI: 10.1177/1091142106288995

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Finance Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().