Budget Rules and State Business Cycles
Robert Krol and
Shirley Svorny ()
Additional contact information
Robert Krol: California State University, Northridge, firstname.lastname@example.org
Public Finance Review, 2007, vol. 35, issue 4, 530-544
Levinson (1998) finds that large states with lenient balanced budget rules experience less cyclical variability. He concludes that state fiscal policy works. However, Levinson's finding is not robust to alternative methods of detrending the data. In addition, the 1984 Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) analysis of state budget rules used by Levinson (and other researchers) is of questionable merit. Reestimation of Levinson's regressions using budget rule classifications in a U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) study reverses his result. The results from this study suggest that existing empirical work using the ACIR index should be revisited.
Keywords: balanced budget rules; business cycles; stabilization policy; state level public finance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:35:y:2007:i:4:p:530-544
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Public Finance Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().