EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

General Fund Financing, Earmarking, Economic Stabilization, and Welfare

Been-Lon Chen and Shun-Fa Lee
Additional contact information
Shun-Fa Lee: Tamkang University

Public Finance Review, 2009, vol. 37, issue 5, 507-538

Abstract: Discussion has been made concerning the pros and cons of financing public projects via either earmarking or a general fund. The article studies the desirability of earmarked and general fund financing based on economic stabilization in a two-sector growth model. Regardless of the nature of public goods, earmarked taxes contribute to aggregate stabilization, while general fund financing may be destabilizing and cause fluctuations. The underlying mechanism in favor of earmarked taxes against general fund financing is that general fund financing creates intersectoral externalities and strategic complementarities that are sufficiently large to exert endogenously persistent and recurring fluctuations in aggregate activities in the absence of shocks to fundamentals. Earmarked taxing generates only sector-specific externalities that are too small to exert local indeterminacy. In a calibrated version, we compute the level of long-run welfare, and the results reflect favorably on the use of earmarked taxing.

Keywords: earmarked tax; general fund finance; indeterminacy; welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1091142109331634 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: General fund financing, earmarking, economic stabilization and welfare (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:37:y:2009:i:5:p:507-538

DOI: 10.1177/1091142109331634

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Finance Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:37:y:2009:i:5:p:507-538