Ask and Ye Shall Receive? Predicting the Successful Appeal of Property Tax Assessments

Rachel N. Weber and Daniel P. McMillen
Additional contact information
Rachel N. Weber: Urban Planning and Policy Program, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, rachelw@uic.edu
Daniel P. McMillen: Department of Economics and Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Public Finance Review, 2010, vol. 38, issue 1, 74-101

Abstract: Appeal processes provide important opportunities to challenge administrative decisions, but adjudicators often lack access to information relevant to the disputed claim. This article examines the motivations for property tax assessment appeals as well as the factors that influence the decision to grant or deny these appeals. We ask whether and how the relative lack of comparable sales in a neighborhood influences the frequency of property assessment appeal applications and their likelihood of success. Using a data set of appeal applications submitted to the first two levels of assessment review in Chicago in 2000 and 2003, we estimate the probability of successful appeal for residential property owners using a sequential probit model. We find that information-rich environments have the potential to both temper the perception of individual mistreatment and improve the quality of assessor decision making. Appeals can compound the lack of uniformity in assessments found in markets with little sales activity.

Keywords: appeal process; property tax; assessment; uniformity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1091142109358703 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:38:y:2010:i:1:p:74-101

DOI: 10.1177/1091142109358703

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Finance Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().