Corporate Taxes, Patent Shifting, and Anti-avoidance Rules: Empirical Evidence

Martina Baumann, Tobias Boehm, Bodo Knoll and Nadine Riedel

Public Finance Review, 2020, vol. 48, issue 4, 467-504

Abstract: We empirically assess international corporate tax avoidance by strategic location of innovative output. The analysis draws on the universe of patent applications to the European Patent Office from 1990 to 2006 linked with data on multinational entities (MNEs) in Europe. Four findings emerge: first, patent holdings are distorted toward low-tax countries. Second, patent location in low-tax countries is correlated with a geographic separation of research and development output and input. Third, MNEs systematically sort high-value (low-value) patents to low-tax (high-tax) countries. Fourth, the propensity to locate patent ownership in low-tax countries is significantly decreased if controlled foreign company rules are enacted in the MNE’s parent country. The tightening of transfer pricing legislation, in turn, exerts a weak negative effect on the location of patent ownership only.

Keywords: corporate patents; patent taxation; profit shifting; anti-avoidance rules (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1091142120930684 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Corporate Taxes, Patent Shifting and Anti-Avoidance Rules: Empirical Evidence (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:48:y:2020:i:4:p:467-504

DOI: 10.1177/1091142120930684

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Finance Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().