COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING MODELS APPLIED TO LABOR NEGOTIATIONS IN THE NETHERLANDS: A COMPARISON BETWEEN AN EXCHANGE MODEL AND A CONFLICT MODEL
Maurice Rojer
Rationality and Society, 1999, vol. 11, issue 2, 207-235
Abstract:
In this article two models of collective decision making, i.e. the Exchange of Voting Positions Model of Stokman and van Oosten and the Expected Utility Model of Bueno de Mesquita, are applied to the practice of labor negotiations in the Netherlands. The purpose of the study is to test the explanatory power of both models with regard to actual labor negotiation processes. Based on data regarding three variables, preferred outcomes, salience, and potential power, the models can simulate a process of collective decision making in a multilateral setting and with respect to a multi-issue agenda. The simulated process leads to predicted outcomes which will be compared with the actual outcomes after the actual negotiations have taken place. With the help of statistical tests regarding the predictive accuracy of the models, an answer will be given to the question of whether one or both of the models can give an adequate explanation of the outcomes of labor negotiation processes.
Keywords: collective decision making; collective bargaining; rational choice collective decision-making models; multilateral decision making; labor negotiations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104346399011002005 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:11:y:1999:i:2:p:207-235
DOI: 10.1177/104346399011002005
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().