STATE INTERVENTION IN IMPERFECT FAMILIES

Peter David Brandon

Rationality and Society, 2001, vol. 13, issue 3, 285-303

Abstract: This paper revisits state intervention in families on behalf of children rather than on behalf of parents. Drawing upon the theory of comparative advantage, the study argues that the reported rise in child abuse and neglect results from parents' lacking the absolute minimum levels of skills needed to sustain a family, not from parents' lacking altruism for children. The analysis has implications for child welfare policies and the sorts of welfare programs families should receive, and questions the efficacy of costly child protection programs. Interestingly, applying the theory of comparative advantage to this unfortunate aspect of family life yields similar conclusions to those reached by others. Most significantly, akin to past studies, this study concludes that the state faces an `agency problem' when it intervenes on behalf of maltreated children, because it cannot fully monitor parents judged as incompetent at raising their children.

Keywords: child abuse and neglect; parenting skills; public assistance and child welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104346301013003001 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:13:y:2001:i:3:p:285-303

DOI: 10.1177/104346301013003001

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().