More freedom of choice but less preference satisfaction in parametric situations

Hanna van Loo
Additional contact information
Hanna van Loo: University of Groningen, The Netherlands, hannavanloo@gmail.com

Rationality and Society, 2010, vol. 22, issue 2, 237-252

Abstract: Freedom of choice is often defended with reference to its positive influence on the satisfaction of preferences. The more choice options there are, the greater the level of utility one derives from choosing one of the options. Moreover, it is assumed that the satisfaction of preferences will not decrease if the size of the choice set increases, in particular in parametric situations. This paper opposes this conclusion by showing that choosing option a from a one-element choice set { a } may not be identical with choosing option a from a two-element choice set { a,b }. The character and the consequences of choosing option a may change considerably with the addition of another option b . Therefore, the level of utility derived from option a changes as well, possibly even in a negative way. Hence, an increase in freedom of choice may diminish one’s preference satisfaction, also in parametric situations.

Keywords: freedom of choice; parametric situations; rational choice; satisfaction of preferences; specific-instrumental value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463110366228 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:22:y:2010:i:2:p:237-252

DOI: 10.1177/1043463110366228

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().