EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network

Stoyan V. Sgourev and Ezra W. Zuckerman
Additional contact information
Stoyan V. Sgourev: ESSEC Business School, France
Ezra W. Zuckerman: MIT Sloan School of Management, USA, ewzucker@MIT.EDU

Rationality and Society, 2011, vol. 23, issue 1, 3-34

Abstract: This paper strengthens the basis for a key claim of contemporary economic sociology — that strong ties among capitalists cannot be reduced to rational considerations. Support for this claim has been limited by reliance on an external standard of rationality, whereby irrationality in commitment to a partner or network is based on an observer’s evaluation of an actor’s interests. In this article we address this limitation by developing an internal standard for assessing the rationality of an actor’s commitment, which is derived from Davidson’s (1980) definition of akrasia or ‘incontinence.’ In addition, we clarify the mechanisms that produce ‘akratic’ commitment among capitalists: (a) short-term emotions that overwhelm rational calculation; and (b) a sense of loyalty that leads one to incorporate others’ interests into one’s own. Finally, we provide systematic evidence of akratic commitment and the proposed mechanisms from studies of an industry peer network in the remodeling construction industry.

Keywords: akrasia; economic sociology; embeddedness; rational action; social network (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463110396444 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:23:y:2011:i:1:p:3-34

DOI: 10.1177/1043463110396444

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:23:y:2011:i:1:p:3-34