An alternative explanation of the chance of casting a pivotal vote

Dan Usher

Rationality and Society, 2014, vol. 26, issue 1, 105-138

Abstract: Uncertainty about the outcome of elections is commonly represented by person-by-person randomization, where people’s probabilities of voting for the left party in a left–right contest are assumed to be uncorrelated but the same. An alternative representation of uncertainty about the outcome of elections relies upon nation-wide randomization shifting the entire schedule of voters’ monetary valuations for one party over the other, up or down, and altering the parties’ vote shares accordingly. The alternative is broadly commensurate with historical evidence about the chance of casting a pivotal vote, gives rise to a chance of casting a pivotal vote that is small but not, as often supposed, infinitesimal, explains an important source of bias in elections and preserves a role for self-interest, as well as duty, in the decision whether to vote or abstain.

Keywords: Duty to vote; pivotal voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463113492308 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: An Alternative Explanation Of The Chance Of Casting A Pivotal Vote (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:26:y:2014:i:1:p:105-138

DOI: 10.1177/1043463113492308

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().