EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Stronger inspection incentives, less crime? Further experimental evidence on inspection games

Heiko Rauhut

Rationality and Society, 2015, vol. 27, issue 4, 414-454

Abstract: When do more severe punishments not deter crimes and when are stronger incentives for control personnel ineffective to motive control? This contribution shows when incentives for crime control have paradoxical effects. It follows from game theoretical reasoning that the opposed interests between criminals and inspectors lead to strategies where both seek to outsmart each other. If both do so, ego’s incentives only affect alter’s behavior. This “strategic incentive effect†implies that higher punishments do not cause fewer crimes, but fewer inspections. This was experimentally corroborated by Rauhut in 2009. The second implication is that stronger inspection incentives do not cause more inspections, but fewer crimes. This paper studies the second implication under farsighted strategic actors, shows its robustness by agent-based simulations of backward-looking learning and provides experimental evidence. In the laboratory experiment, 200 subjects were partitioned into “citizens†who could steal money from each other and “inspectors†who could invest in inspection to detect criminal citizens. Results confirm that stronger inspection incentives cause less crime. However, actors are less strategic than predicted: stronger inspection incentives also cause more inspections. This is discussed by differentiating between the “strategic incentive-effect†, where ego’s incentives only affect alter’s behavior and the “own incentive-effect†, where ego’s incentives also affect ego’s behavior. Conclusions discuss alternative models of rationality and heuristics and how the presented findings may be used for constructing novel theories on crime and social norms. Policy implications are also discussed.

Keywords: Crime; punishment; control; social norms; learning; behavioral game theory; subjective probabilities; beliefs; social cognition; heuristics; strategic incentive-effect; own incentive-effect; simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463115576140 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:27:y:2015:i:4:p:414-454

DOI: 10.1177/1043463115576140

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:27:y:2015:i:4:p:414-454