Ideology and the rationality of non-voting

François Facchini and Louis Jaeck
Additional contact information
Louis Jaeck: United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates

Rationality and Society, 2019, vol. 31, issue 3, 265-286

Abstract: What is the theoretical impact of the erosion of partisan ties on electoral abstention? This question comes from Downs–North’s theory of political ideology, which is a tool to reduce the cost of understanding the political debates. Then, when the left–right political divide becomes less visible, the costs of understanding political debates rise and electoral abstention occurs. This interpretation of abstention has three implications: first, it shows that among the multiple reasons responsible for the ‘democratic crisis’ in France, the weakening of the traditional notion of the left and the right is significant. Second, it highlights that voters’ level of education and the Downsian theory of programme convergence affect electoral behaviours and political entrepreneurship. Third, it explains why the relationship between abstention and economic crisis is nonlinear.

Keywords: Abstention; economic crisis; ideology; rationality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463119841033 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Ideology and the rationality of non-voting (2019)
Working Paper: Ideology and the rationality of non-voting (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:31:y:2019:i:3:p:265-286

DOI: 10.1177/1043463119841033

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().