EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The five games of Mr Edgar Allan Poe: A study of strategic thought in ‘The Purloined Letter’

Daniel Read

Rationality and Society, 2020, vol. 32, issue 4, 369-401

Abstract: This paper investigates strategic thinking in the fictional world of Edgar Allan Poe’s ‘The Purloined Letter’. This short story has been rightly celebrated for its explicit analysis of strategic reasoning in which players attempt to outwit one another, which involves accounting for how they are all attempting to outwit one another. I differ from previous analyses by examining how the actors can often be wrong in their explicit analysis and consider the strategic actions they take rather than those they claim to take. Using elementary game theory, I describe the five games (and suggest a sixth) that make up the strategic heart of the story. These include games of signalling, screening, negotiation, revenge and a unique game called the ‘pincer’. I consider how literary sources like ‘The Purloined Letter’ can provide insights into the applicability of strategic analysis in the ‘real world’.

Keywords: Blackmail; humanities; negotiation; other regarding preferences; signalling; strategic thinking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463120961779 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:32:y:2020:i:4:p:369-401

DOI: 10.1177/1043463120961779

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-25
Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:32:y:2020:i:4:p:369-401