EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Relative risk aversion models: How plausible are their assumptions?

Carlo Barone, Katherin Barg and Mathieu Ichou
Additional contact information
Carlo Barone: Sciences Po, France
Katherin Barg: University of Exeter, UK
Mathieu Ichou: Institut national d’études démographiques, France

Rationality and Society, 2021, vol. 33, issue 2, 143-175

Abstract: This work examines the validity of the two main assumptions of relative risk-aversion models of educational inequality. We compare the Breen-Goldthorpe (BG) and the Breen-Yaish (BY) models in terms of their assumptions about status maintenance motives and beliefs about the occupational risks associated with educational decisions. Concerning the first assumption, our contribution is threefold. First, we criticise the assumption of the BG model that families aim only at avoiding downward mobility and are insensitive to the prospects of upward mobility. We argue that the loss-aversion assumption proposed by BY is a more realistic formulation of status-maintenance motives. Second, we propose and implement a novel empirical approach to assess the validity of the loss-aversion assumption. Third, we present empirical results based on a sample of families of lower secondary school leavers indicating that families are sensitive to the prospects of both upward and downward mobility, and that the loss-aversion hypothesis of BY is empirically supported. As regards the risky choice assumption, we argue that families may not believe that more ambitious educational options entail occupational risks relative to less ambitious ones. We present empirical evidence indicating that, in France, the academic path is not perceived as a risky option. We conclude that, if the restrictive assumptions of the BG model are removed, relative-risk aversion needs not drive educational inequalities.

Keywords: Breen-Goldthorpe model; educational aspirations; educational inequality; loss-aversion; relative risk aversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463121994087 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:33:y:2021:i:2:p:143-175

DOI: 10.1177/1043463121994087

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2022-04-16
Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:33:y:2021:i:2:p:143-175