Tocqueville and the Ambivalences of Democracy

Frank Ankersmit
Additional contact information
Frank Ankersmit: University of Groningen

Rationality and Society, 1991, vol. 3, issue 3, 308-316

Abstract: Despite the clarity of his style, Tocqueville is continually drawn toward self-contradiction. This inconsistent and ambiguous Tocqueville should be taken no less seriously than Elster's reedited and purified Tocqueville. Indeed, ambiguity seems part and parcel of democracy as Tocqueville envisages it, a view which is defended by pointing toward his peculiar obsession with civil liberty to the expense of political liberty, his ambivalent account of “independence,†and his equally ambivalent notion of the “guardianship†of the modern democratic state.

Date: 1991
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463191003003004 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:3:y:1991:i:3:p:308-316

DOI: 10.1177/1043463191003003004

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().