Theories of Gender Stratification

Robert Fiorentine
Additional contact information
Robert Fiorentine: University of California, Los Angeles

Rationality and Society, 1993, vol. 5, issue 3, 341-366

Abstract: Gender stratification theories are reviewed in light of their causal assumptions, empirical evidence, and “agency†and “equity†implications. Agency involves the relative capacity of the individual to influence occupational outcomes; equity pertains to the perceived fairness of occupational rewards. It is concluded that the empirical support for the structural functionalist, structural barriers, cognitive, normative barriers, and normative alternative theories of gender stratification is either contradictory, equivocal, or limited. Further compounding the mixed empirical record is that the method used by many proponents of the structural barriers approach to measure sex discrimination is based on a logical fallacy that confuses outcome with process. Finally, the theories make quite divergent assumptions concerning agency and equity. These differences lead to contradictory conclusions about the degree that individuals, and particularly women, can control their occupational destiny, the possibility of increased gender egalitarianism, and the logic and efficacy of conservative, liberal, and radical political agendas.

Date: 1993
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463193005003004 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:5:y:1993:i:3:p:341-366

DOI: 10.1177/1043463193005003004

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().