On Social Class Confusion

Alan Carling
Additional contact information
Alan Carling: University of Bradford

Rationality and Society, 1994, vol. 6, issue 2, 190-217

Abstract: Different schools of sociological thought have characteristic confusions about the concept of social class: whether it refers to individuals or households; whether it is about social inequality, social change, or social mobility; and whether the relevant inequalities arise from differences in being (identity), having (resources), or doing (activity, especially working activity). The idea is defended that inequality of welfare is the touchstone of social class, but welfare levels depend on preferences as well as circumstances and actions. It follows that class is about the unequal levels of welfare that standardized individuals suffer (or enjoy) as a result of the social distribution of the forces of production. Given this conception, the scope of class confusion narrows to the questions of how to standardize individuals appropriately and where to draw the boundaries of classes in terms of the appropriate welfare levels.

Date: 1994
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463194006002003 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:6:y:1994:i:2:p:190-217

DOI: 10.1177/1043463194006002003

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().