CONSEQUENCES OF REVOLUTIONS

Erich Weede and Edward N. Muller

Rationality and Society, 1997, vol. 9, issue 3, 327-350

Abstract: This is an attempt to evaluate the consequences of revolutions. In our view, revolutions do not contribute to the promotion of liberty, they merely generate a new ruling class or oligarchy, stronger armed forces and more war-involvement. Whether evaluated by economic growth rates, income inequality, or quality of life, the economic performance of postrevolutionary regimes looks unconvincing. Certainly, it cannot compensate for the extraordinary loss of life resulting from 20th century revolutions. This negative balance sheet of revolutions may be explained by a rational choice approach. If public interests or collective goods for the people determined the course of revolutionary events, then the balance should look much better than it does. If revolutionaries are motivated by lust for power and greed, however, then revolutions are human and social capital wasting exercises on a grand scale.

Keywords: oligarchy; repression; revolution; violence; war (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104346397009003004 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:9:y:1997:i:3:p:327-350

DOI: 10.1177/104346397009003004

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Rationality and Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().