EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimal mission duration for systems subject to shocks and internal failures

Maxim Finkelstein and Gregory Levitin

Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2018, vol. 232, issue 1, 82-91

Abstract: At many instances, it is more cost-effective to terminate operation of a system than to wait for its failure or completion of a mission. Usually, completion of a mission (contract) results in an additional reward, whereas premature termination results in a penalty. However, the system failure during the mission can incur considerable expenses. As the failure probability increases with the mission time, this can make the mission completion too risky and not beneficial. This article analyzes the optimal mission duration for non-repairable systems subject to shocks and internal failures. Under certain assumptions, an optimal time of mission termination is obtained. It is shown that, if for some reason, the termination is not technically possible at this optimal time, the mission should be terminated within a specific time interval and, if this is not possible, it should not be terminated beyond this interval. Illustrative examples are presented.

Keywords: Premature mission termination; system failure; external shocks; expected profit; optimization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17742767 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:1:p:82-91

DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17742767

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Risk and Reliability
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:1:p:82-91