 A Comparison of the Effects of Augmented Reality N-Back Training and Traditional Two-Dimensional N-Back Training on Working MemoryBo Zhang and Nigel Robb SAGE Open, 2021, vol. 11, issue 2, 21582440211014507 Abstract: We compared two versions of an n-back training program, differing from the graphical perspective, on the effects of working memory (WM) training and transfer. Sixty participants were trained on a traditional n-back task (2D perspective) or an augmented reality (AR) version of the same program. The AR version was rated more engaging and graphically stimulating. Pre- and post-performance on a 2D spatial working memory (SWM) test showed that while both groups improved, the distributions of improvement differed significantly between the groups; the group using traditional training showed generally more improvement on the easier levels of the SWM test. These results may be explained by the fact that the traditional (2D) version of the n-back training was more similar than the AR version to the SWM outcome measure (in virtue of its 2D presentation). This may support the common demands theory of training transfer, which claims that shared demands between training and transfer tasks accounts for near-transfer improvements. Keywords: working memory; traditional n-back task; spatial working memory test; augmented reality n-back task; training transfer (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:21582440211014507 DOI: 10.1177/21582440211014507 Access Statistics for this article More articles in SAGE Open |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.