The Communication of Justice, Injustice, and Necessary Evils: An Empirical Examination

Meghan A. Thornton-Lugo and Deborah E. Rupp

SAGE Open, 2021, vol. 11, issue 3, 21582440211040796

Abstract: The prevailing approach to studying justice in the workplace has focused on recipients and observers of justice. This approach, however, fails to consider the experience of other parties including those who communicate justice. To understand the experience of communicating fairness, we investigated how justice, injustice, and necessary evils differentially affect guilt and stress. In addition, we explored how communicating bad news compares to these experiences. Across two studies, we found evidence showing that guilt and stress were affected by what was being communicated, such that injustice and necessary evils provoked more guilt and stress than justice. These findings highlight how justice broadly affects communicators psychologically and physiologically.

Keywords: industrial and organizational psychology; organizational behavior; management; social sciences; organizational behavior; organizational communication; emotion; experimental psychology; psychology; industrial/organizational psychology; applied psychology; psychology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211040796 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211040796

DOI: 10.1177/21582440211040796

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SAGE Open
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().