Comparison of Factor Retention Methods in Exploratory Factor Analysis: RMSEA, Root Deterioration per Restriction and Parallel Analysis

Sangyoug Bae and Sehee Hong

SAGE Open, 2024, vol. 14, issue 4, 21582440241301840

Abstract: The primary goal of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is to determine the number of factors and their structure. Thus, the decision on the number of factors to retain is crucial. Nevertheless, researchers frequently overlook the precision of factor retention techniques and opt for unreliable methodologies instead. The objective of this study is to compare the efficiency of utilizing root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and parallel analysis (PA) methods for retaining factors in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Two methods for comparing RMSEA, namely root deterioration per restriction (RDR) and RMSEA difference test, are employed for nested models. Although researchers use RMSEA to compare two different models, no studies have compared RMSEA and RDR methods. Thus, this study examined three different methods for factor retention. Monte-Carlo simulations were utilized to evaluate the accuracy of RDR compared to RMSEA difference testing and PA. The simulations show that RDR performs better than RMSEA difference testing and PA when the number of variables per factor is low. However, as the number of variables per factor increases, PA becomes more effective. This study provides guidance to researchers using EFA to select factor retention methods that suit different conditions.

Keywords: exploratory factor analysis; model fit index; root mean square error of approximation; root deterioration per restriction; parallel analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241301840 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241301840

DOI: 10.1177/21582440241301840

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SAGE Open
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().