A Comparative Analysis of Moral Discourse in Chinese and American Courtrooms
Min Yang and
Ye Lin
SAGE Open, 2025, vol. 15, issue 1, 21582440251323338
Abstract:
Moral discourse embodies interpersonal communication, social relations, responsibilities, and obligations and serves as a reasoning and lecturing tool during judicial activities. As moral imperatives are ingrained in the culture that is instilled into individuals, this study develops an analytical model for identity construction in courtroom moral narratives. The study draws eclectically on the Discourse-Historical Approach in Critical Discourse Studies, positioning theory, and proximization theory. It does so by investigating themes, discursive strategies, linguistic realizations, and identity categories in 10 trials, five selected from court sources in China and five from sources in the United States. Through exploring and interpreting historical and cultural backgrounds, participant identity construction was analyzed and differences between the two countries, with their different legal cultures, were illustrated. Contrasting the moral discourse differences in Chinese and American courtrooms, this study illuminates the complementary use of moral discourse in both courtrooms.
Keywords: courtroom moral narratives; discourse-historical approach; positioning theory; proximization theory; identity construction; China; the United States (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251323338 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251323338
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251323338
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in SAGE Open
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().