Development of a Rubric to Assess Academic Writing Incorporating Plagiarism Detectors

Salim Razı

SAGE Open, 2015, vol. 5, issue 2, 2158244015590162

Abstract: Similarity reports of plagiarism detectors should be approached with caution as they may not be sufficient to support allegations of plagiarism. This study developed a 50-item rubric to simplify and standardize evaluation of academic papers. In the spring semester of 2011-2012 academic year, 161 freshmen’s papers at the English Language Teaching Department of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey, were assessed using the rubric. Validity and reliability were established. The results indicated citation as a particularly problematic aspect, and indicated that fairer assessment could be achieved by using the rubric along with plagiarism detectors’ similarity results.

Keywords: academic writing; academic writing scoring rubric; assessing academic papers; plagiarism; plagiarism detector; Turnitin (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015590162 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:2158244015590162

DOI: 10.1177/2158244015590162

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SAGE Open
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().